Philadelphia stirs a lap dance tax tussle
2 'gentlemen's clubs' are crying foul over the city's attempt to collect more than $800,000 in amusement levies.
Philadelphia has determined that the code of chivalry doesn't
cover lap dances -- but its amusement tax does.
A five-year audit by city officials found Club
Risque and Cheerleaders, two so-called gentlemen's clubs, had failed to collect
the 5% amusement tax on their performances and owe $320,538 and $486,482 in
taxes, respectively.
The owners have filed an appeal with the Tax
Review Board, which is slated to hear the case later this month.
Attorney George Bochetto, who represents the
clubs, told ABC News, "Since the city is broke, they want money for lap dances."
He couldn't be reached for comment for this story.
Actually, the city's finances are
improving. Standard & Poor's recently raised its rating on
Philadelphia's debt, and officials expect a $178 million surplus this year.
Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, of course,
sees things differently than the clubs do. Spokesman Mark McDonald denied that
there was a "lap dance tax." He also told MSN Money that other strip clubs in
the city pay taxes on lap dance performances.
"I am not in a position to talk about pending litigation,"
McDonald said, adding that another taxpayer, whom he declined to identify, is in
the same situation.
In the city's view, a lap dance is like any other service the
club is offering, such as alcoholic drinks, that are subject to tax.
This issue has actually come up before.
New York's highest court ruled last
year that lap dances were not "dramatic or musical arts performances" like
ballet or theater and were therefore subject to taxation. The 4-3 decision cost
the club Nite Moves almost $125,000, according to The New York Times. An attorney for the clubs was quoted as
saying he would appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, though odds of that
being successful are slim.
If Nite Moves had won its case, strip-show
attendees could have argued without fear of contradiction that they were
"patrons of the arts."
No comments:
Post a Comment